Back to the MIT repository
6. Socioeconomic and Environmental3 - Other

Challenges in perceiving, measuring, and recognizing harm

Harm from AI often manifests subtly or over the long term, making it difficult to identify, measure, and address effectively.

Source: MIT AI Risk Repositorymit1056

ENTITY

3 - Other

INTENT

3 - Other

TIMING

3 - Other

Risk ID

mit1056

Domain lineage

6. Socioeconomic and Environmental

262 mapped risks

6.5 > Governance failure

Mitigation strategy

1. Implement continuous, evidence-based monitoring and auditing processes to track system performance, drift, and fairness metrics post-deployment, thereby capturing subtle shifts in risk profiles that static assessments often miss. 2. Establish a rigorous system for maintaining comprehensive audit trails and decision logs that record all AI system behaviors, outputs, and underlying data provenance, ensuring traceability and accountability for harms that manifest over extended periods. 3. Prioritize the use of Explainable AI (XAI) and algorithmic transparency methods to elucidate the decision-making pathways of complex models, which is essential for diagnosing latent biases and ensuring that human oversight can effectively validate system results before they lead to systemic harm.