Inadequate management of AGI
The capabilities of current risk management and legal processes in the context of the development of an AGI.
ENTITY
1 - Human
INTENT
3 - Other
TIMING
1 - Pre-deployment
Risk ID
mit106
Domain lineage
6. Socioeconomic and Environmental
6.5 > Governance failure
Mitigation strategy
1. Establish Proactive and Legally-Informed Governance Frameworks: Implement comprehensive, multidisciplinary governance structures that mandate transparency, define clear lines of accountability, and align AGI development with human values and societal norms. This includes developing new regulatory and legal instruments specific to AGI to manage existential and societal risks, supported by continuous oversight and compliance programs (Source 1, 4, 12, 16). 2. Mandate Rigorous, Multi-Stage Risk Identification and Assessment: Require AGI developers to adopt established, structured risk assessment techniques from other high-risk industries, such as System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) and scenario analysis, to systematically identify and evaluate catastrophic risks. This process must include mandatory pre-training and pre-deployment risk assessments, as well as third-party model audits and adversarial red-teaming, to empirically validate safety and security posture (Source 1, 3, 17, 19). 3. Integrate Technical and Organizational Corrigibility Mechanisms: Implement a multilayered system of technical and organizational controls to ensure the AGI system remains corrigible and aligned with human intent. This involves developing sophisticated goal alignment safeguards, designing human-factors-informed interfaces for effective oversight, and establishing robust security and containment strategies to mitigate the risks of loss of control, unauthorized self-modification, and malicious exploitation (Source 1, 16, 18, 20).