Geopolitical competition for superiority
Strategic competition between nations over AI capabilities could heighten global tensions and destabilize international relations.
ENTITY
1 - Human
INTENT
2 - Unintentional
TIMING
3 - Other
Risk ID
mit1069
Domain lineage
6. Socioeconomic and Environmental
6.4 > Competitive dynamics
Mitigation strategy
1. Prioritize the establishment of a **legally binding, universal AI governance framework** through multilateral institutions (e.g., UN, G20/G7), focusing on closing the current "global governance deficit" to prevent the fragmentation of regulatory regimes and ensure compliance across nations. 2. Institute **diplomatic and regulatory mechanisms** aimed at averting "AI arms races," specifically by establishing international agreements on responsible military use of AI, including confidence-building measures and arms control agreements to ensure human control over critical AI-enabled weapon systems. 3. Mandate the **global adoption of common technical safety and transparency standards** (e.g., based on the OECD AI Principles or similar) for general-purpose and advanced AI models. This promotes shared accountability, enhances international interoperability, and facilitates mutual auditing to build trust and mitigate risks associated with divergent national safety practices.