Exploitative data sourcing and enrichment
Perpetuating exploitative labour practices to build AI systems (sourcing, user testing)
ENTITY
1 - Human
INTENT
1 - Intentional
TIMING
1 - Pre-deployment
Risk ID
mit284
Domain lineage
6. Socioeconomic and Environmental
6.2 > Increased inequality and decline in employment quality
Mitigation strategy
1. Institute a rigorous, end-to-end supply chain due diligence protocol that mandates continuous monitoring, independent audits, and human rights impact assessments across all data sourcing and annotation activities. This protocol must verify compliance with international labor standards, specifically addressing working hours, fair compensation, and the provision of adequate occupational health and safety protections, including psychological safeguards for exposure to toxic content. 2. Establish and actively promote non-retaliatory worker-centered grievance mechanisms that provide data annotators, testers, and other laborers genuine input into the design and deployment of the AI systems they support. This includes fortifying the rights to organize and bargain collectively, ensuring a clear channel for workers to report exploitative conditions and appeal decisions influenced by automated monitoring. 3. Enforce strict contractual requirements with all vendors and suppliers to ensure full transparency regarding labor practices, including the explicit disclosure of any electronic monitoring or data collection pertaining to workers. Furthermore, mandate human oversight procedures for high-risk tasks, such as content moderation or quality assurance involving potentially toxic material, to mitigate psychological harm and prevent the use of AI systems to undermine fundamental labor rights.
ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Example: Exposing human annotators to toxic audiovisual content (Perrigo, 2023)*