Environmental cost
Large-scale DL systems can produce signicant carbon emissions as a result of the computational demands of training runs and inference [539]
ENTITY
2 - AI
INTENT
2 - Unintentional
TIMING
1 - Pre-deployment
Risk ID
mit875
Domain lineage
6. Socioeconomic and Environmental
6.6 > Environmental harm
Mitigation strategy
1. Prioritize Energy-Efficient Infrastructure and Renewable Energy Procurement: Implement specialized, energy-optimized hardware, such as Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) or Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), and deploy advanced cooling systems to maximize computational efficiency per unit of energy. Concurrently, mandate the use of data centers powered by verifiable low-carbon or renewable energy sources (e.g., solar, wind, geothermal) to directly decouple computational load from greenhouse gas emissions. 2. Optimize Algorithmic and Model Efficiency: Employ resource-frugal development methodologies by selecting smaller or more efficient model architectures, leveraging pre-trained models (transfer learning), and utilizing intelligent hyperparameter search techniques instead of computationally expensive brute-force methods (e.g., grid search). This minimizes the total number of computational cycles and redundant training runs required for model development. 3. Institutionalize Carbon-Aware Computing and Continuous Life-Cycle Monitoring: Integrate real-time carbon intensity data into the deployment and scheduling pipeline to dynamically route or pause computationally intensive workloads to regions and time periods where the electricity grid's carbon intensity is demonstrably low. This operational strategy must be supported by standardized procedures for continuously measuring, reporting, and auditing the full life-cycle carbon footprint of the AI system, including both training and inference phases.